2024 · Paper IV · 10 marksFrequently asked

Evaluate the innovativeness of the Fifteenth Finance Commission on Centre-State relations regarding the sharing of tax revenues.

In short

The Fifteenth Finance Commission innovated by adding forest and ecology (10%), demographic performance (12.5%) and tax effort (2.5%) to devolution criteria, setting the states' share at 41% for the new UTs. Its impact on Centre-State relations is partial, as rising cesses and surcharges outside the divisible pool shrink actual transfers.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The Fifteenth Finance Commission21 (FFC), for 2021-26, innovated Centre-State tax revenue sharing amid GST reforms and new Union Territories, aiming to balance equity, efficiency, and fiscal discipline. It responded to evolving fiscal federalism challenges, including rising cess revenues shrinking the divisible pool and changing political geography.
Innovative Features
•

Broadened Devolution Criteria

FFC added forest and ecology (10%) and demographic performance (12.5%) to traditional factors like income distance (45%) and population (15%), incentivizing environmental and demographic priorities, benefiting states like Telangana’s agency tracts with tribal populations and forest areas.

•

Inclusion of Tax Effort and Targeted Grants3

A small weight (2.5%) was given to tax effort to encourage states’ revenue mobilization. Additionally, substantial grants-in-aid were recommended, including Rs 2.94 lakh crore for revenue deficit states and Rs 1.29 lakh crore for sectoral needs like health and education, blending devolution with targeted support.

Impact on Centre-State Relations
•

Shrinking Divisible Pool

Rising cesses and surcharges excluded from the divisible pool reduced states’ effective share from the nominal 41%, limiting FFC’s devolution impact, since these levies are not shared with states.

Effectiveness and Implications
•

Partial Vertical Imbalance Addressed

Targeted grants and maintaining a 41% share have helped address vertical fiscal imbalance, but the growing share of non-divisible cesses limits actual resources available to states.

Conclusion
FFC’s approach is innovative in broadening devolution criteria and balancing new fiscal realities but remains constrained by shrinking divisible pools and political tensions among states.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Fifteenth FC: who gets what. Fifteenth FC: who gets what. Diagram (tree): Fifteenth FC: who gets what; Horizontal devolution criteria; Income distance 45%; Population 15%, area 15%; Demographic performance 12.5%; Forest and ecology 10%; Tax effort 2.5%
Diagram: Fifteenth FC: who gets what

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Public finance, budget, monetary and fiscal policy4 questions

Asked in 2 of 2 sittings since 2016

2016
2
2024
2

Most tested: Tax reforms and fiscal federalism in India, especially GST and Finance Commission-based tax devolution.

All 4 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official TGPSC Group-I Mains 2024 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·